Markets· August 17, 2026 at 12:45 p.m.
Comparing Global and International Real Estate ETFs: REET vs HAUZ
Key takeaways
- REET provides broad exposure to worldwide real estate markets
- HAUZ focuses on international property markets excluding the U.S.
- REET has a higher expense ratio and yield compared to HAUZ
Investors seeking exposure to global real estate markets have two Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) to consider: iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF (HAUZ).
While both funds offer access to income-producing properties like warehouses, apartments, and cell towers, they differ in their scope and fees.
REET provides broad exposure to real estate markets worldwide, including the United States, with a 0.14% expense ratio and a 3.3% yield. In contrast, HAUZ focuses on international property markets, excluding the U.S., at a lower fee of 0.1% and a higher yield of 3.6%.
Both ETFs have performed well over the past five years, with REET delivering a slightly higher total return due to its more global diversification, including the U.S. market. However, HAUZ offers more international exposure, with limited exposure to the U.S.
For investors already heavily allocated to the U.S. real estate market, HAUZ may provide a complementary investment for diversification across the global real estate market. On the other hand, if looking to invest in just one ETF as a standalone real estate investment, REET's global mandate might be preferred.
It is essential to consider the specific investment needs and allocation before deciding between these two ETFs.
